For many clients, litigation is a frightening and intimidating experience. Most clients do not understand pretrial procedure, motion practice, discovery or the length of time it takes to get a case to trial. When faced with the emotions and costs of litigation, clients need a seasoned and experienced trial attorney who has been in the courtroom before. They need someone who knows the judges and judicial staff and knows how the litigation process works – not someone who is a novice or learning the craft at the client’s expense.

Our attorneys pull from a broad base of experiences and have tried a wide variety of cases in both state and federal courts. We have successfully litigated everything from complex commercial litigation, contract disputes, Uniform Commercial Code disputes, bankruptcy and federal court cases, probate and trust disputes, divorce and personal injury to serious criminal cases.  Experience counts, and our attorneys have it.

We utilize computers, iPads, projectors and media technology to best present our clients’ cases. Using the latest in modern technology allows us to better organize and better present our clients’ cases effectively, persuasively and efficiently.

More importantly, we understand the costs of litigation: both emotional and financial.  We work closely with our clients to assess the true objectives of lawsuits and then work vigorously to achieve those goals and minimize the clutter and costs of unnecessary ancillary disputes.  While our “team” may not be large in terms of numbers, we are huge in experience and results.

Although resolution is always a goal, our ultimate goal is to serve our clients’ best interests. Therefore, if we cannot settle a dispute to our client’s advantage, we are willing to take the case to court. Furthermore, we are no strangers to appellate courts, having handled over 75 appeals in the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Typical kinds of cases we handle include:

  • Complex Commercial Litigation
  • Commercial Contract Disputes
  • Individual Contract Disputes
  • Protection of Employer’s Proprietary Rights Including Covenants Not to Compete and Non-disclosure Agreements
  • Business Torts
  • Employee Misappropriation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • Unfair Competition
  • Defective Goods and Products
  • Sale of Goods
  • Domestic Relations
  • Environmental
  • Appeals
  • Minority Stockholder Squeeze-out and Oppression
  • Real Estate
  • Construction Liens and Disputes
  • Boundary Line Disputes
  • Commercial Condominium Disputes
  • Commercial and Residential Landlord/Tenant
  • Easement Disputes
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Water Law and Riparian Rights
  • Criminal:  Misdemeanor and Felony
  • Driver’s License Restoration

We understand that litigation budgets are tight in today’s economy.  We work with our clients from day one to establish budgets and discuss alternative fee agreements, contingent fees, fixed fees, value billing and blended fee arrangements.

Attorneys to contact:

Recent News

GGTM Welcomes Litigator Daniel R. Olson To Its Team
Posted on March 2, 2017
Daniel R. Olson has joined Gielow Groom Terpstra & McEvoy (“GGTM”), adding strength and experience to the firm’s growing legal team. Dan brings the number of attorneys now practicing at GGTM to seven and also brings with him 15 years’ experience as a general litigator, having handled cases from the local district court to the U.S. Supreme Court. Dan’s unique background and experience are valuable assets to GGTM and its clients. After graduating summa cum laude from Michigan State University, Detroit College of Law, in 2002, Dan spent two years as a clerk for Justice Stephen J. Markman (now... MORE
Michigan Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Amended – Elimination of Buy-Downs for Small UST Owners and Retroactive Reduction in Deductibles
Posted on January 3, 2017
2016 closed out with some good news for underground storage tank (UST) owners in Michigan. On December 21, 2016, Governor Snyder signed House Bill 5599 into law (PA 380 of 2016), amending UST corrective action funding provisions of Part 215 of Michigan’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA), 1994 PA 451, as amended. The most significant impact of this amendment is two-fold: the lowering of deductibles (from $50,000 to $10,000 per claim for owners/operators of eight or more USTs, and from $50,000 to $2,000 per claim for UST owners/operators of seven or fewer USTs). Further, these lower deductible... MORE
Happy Holidays!
Posted on December 22, 2016
GGTM Law is spreading joy this holiday season with the help of the Mona Shores Choir. Please enjoy viewing our Christmas card while listening to this beautiful arrangement of a Christmas classic sung by the Mona Shores Choir. Wishing each of you Happy Holidays and a Joyful New Year!... MORE
See More Posts