End of life choices are painful to think about, much less decide. Yet, the unfortunate reality is that every day loved ones are forced to make these painful decisions on behalf of a parent, a spouse, or a special friend or family member. Advanced medical directives can’t take away the pain of losing a loved one, but they can at least reassure the person burdened with making those difficult decisions that a loved one’s wishes are being honored.

A good power of attorney for health care takes a “belt and suspenders” approach to medical directives. The document should include all of the following:

  • Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care
    Similar to a durable power of attorney for your financial and personal affairs, this document allows you to designate a patient advocate who will make your health care decisions when you are incapacitated.
  • Living Will
    Your “Living Will” instructs your patient advocate regarding your end of life decisions. A Living Will provides you the opportunity to determine if, and to what extent, you want your life to be sustained by artificial means if you are in an irreversible coma or a persistent vegetative state.
  • HIPAA Authorization
    Absent your written authorization, doctors are prohibited by state and federal law to share your medical information with anyone. A HIPAA Authorization allows doctors to share your medical information only with those you specify.

We advise that you provide a copy of your Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care to your physician to be kept with your medical records.

Attorney to Contact:

Recent News

Michigan Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Amended – Elimination of Buy-Downs for Small UST Owners and Retroactive Reduction in Deductibles
Posted on January 3, 2017
2016 closed out with some good news for underground storage tank (UST) owners in Michigan. On December 21, 2016, Governor Snyder signed House Bill 5599 into law (PA 380 of 2016), amending UST corrective action funding provisions of Part 215 of Michigan’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA), 1994 PA 451, as amended. The most significant impact of this amendment is two-fold: the lowering of deductibles (from $50,000 to $10,000 per claim for owners/operators of eight or more USTs, and from $50,000 to $2,000 per claim for UST owners/operators of seven or fewer USTs). Further, these lower deductible... MORE
Happy Holidays!
Posted on December 22, 2016
GGTM Law is spreading joy this holiday season with the help of the Mona Shores Choir. Please enjoy viewing our Christmas card while listening to this beautiful arrangement of a Christmas classic sung by the Mona Shores Choir. Wishing each of you Happy Holidays and a Joyful New Year!... MORE
Non-Competes Between Commercial Ventures to be Assessed Under Rule of Reason
Posted on July 18, 2016
In Innovation Ventures v Liquid Manufacturing, LLC, Michigan Supreme Court Docket No. 150591 (decided July 14, 2016), the Michigan Supreme Court considered whether the validity of a covenant not to compete should be determined by looking at the factors provided in MCL 445.774a or by using the “rule of reason” analysis. MCL 445.774a sets forth factors for a court to consider in analyzing covenants not to compete in an employer-employee context. The covenant not to compete considered in this case, however, was in a written agreement between two businesses. The statutory factors include the following: (1) duration of the... MORE
See More Posts